Sách luận-điển Đạo giáo theo lối loại thư, trích và bàn các khái niệm kinh điển (thần, tiên, đạo, đức, thiên địa). Ít chi tiết tác giả; thường được xếp gần nhóm bách khoa đời Đường–Ngũ Đại.
Ứng dụng: tham chiếu khái niệm
唐佚名道教类书，原约三十卷，今残四卷，道藏太平部。列太君、大神、飞天、童子、道士、先生、尸解、诽谤、耽酒、不孝等五十余品目，每目广引《太平经》《太真科》《升玄经》等唐前道经释义。功能近「道教名词辞典」：明神位称谓、道门身份、成仙途径与罪罚条目。残卷仍可见「故气为灾」「杀生鼓舞」等科戒思维，是研究中古道门术语、神谱与伦理禁忌的重要类书，与《一切道经音义》《三洞珠囊》互补。
⚡ Ứng dụng: 查考道门神名、称谓与罪罚术语；解读古科仪文书中「故气」「尸解」等词时作义项依据。
🔗 Liên quan: 一切道经音义妙门由起；三洞珠囊；要修科仪戒律钞
Daoist doctrine is proven not by isolated revelation but by a hierarchical canon that maps ranks of texts to ranks of efficacy: higher scriptures govern deeper transformation because they encode more complete causal models of the Dao. The work establishes that orthodoxy is a logic of correspondence—name, rank, and function must cohere—so that misranked practice cannot yield true realization.
1) Classify any BaZi or cultivation method by which layer it claims to move (qi, shen, ming, Dao). 2) Match method to a text class of equal scope before using it. 3) Reject “one chart, one fix” that ignores rank of cause. 4) When results fail, re-check category mismatch before blaming timing. 5) Build a personal hierarchy of techniques from coarse adjustment to fine attunement.
Unlike encyclopedic catalogues that list titles only, 道典论 argues for a logic of ranking. It differs from pure ritual manuals by making classification itself the proof of orthodoxy, not procedural detail.